Legal Opinion

Kirby v. State

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On motion to quash an indictment

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reed, J.

This indictment is for extortion. It sets out that Kirby, Richman and Westcott constituted the board of license commissioners of Cumberland county, and as such were officers of this state, duly empowered to grant licenses to sell liquor; and being such officers with such power did, by color of their said office, extortionate!y demand and receive from one Taylor a certain sum of money as a fee or reward for doing their office.

Extortion technically is an official misdemeanor, while in its larger sense it signifies any oppression under color of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  2. State ex rel. Loucks v. BradshawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. ManzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. State v. WeleckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Kovalycsik v. City of GarfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. State v. CorriganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
  5. State v. BegynSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API