Legal Opinion
Nast v. Michels
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 1986No. 51741-0Published
1Opinion of the Court
107 Wn.2d 300 (1986)
730 P.2d 54
THOMAS B. NAST, Respondent,
v.
M. JANICE MICHELS, ET AL, Appellants.
No. 51741-0.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
December 4, 1986.
As amended by order December 19, 1986.
Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Fred Kaseburg, Deputy, for appellants.
Thomas B. Nast, pro se, Fred Diamondstone, and Stephen K. Strong (of Bendich, Stobaugh & Strong), for respondent.
[As amended by order of the Supreme Court December 19, 1986.]
GOODLOE, J.
Appellants, King County Superior Court Clerk, King County Department of Judicial Administration, and King County appeal the trial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. CridenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.