Mangham v. Hotel & Restaurant Supply Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Franicum, Judge.
Where one person executes and delivers to another separate and distinct promissory notes, each note constitutes a separate and distinct cause of action, and after maturity of all the notes the payee may bring separate suits upon them, or he may exercise the privilege of joinder accorded by ’Code § 3-113, and sue upon all of the notes in one action. Parris v. Hightower, 76 Ga. 631 (2); Starnes v. Mutual Loan &c. Co., 102 Ga. 597, 598 (5) (29 SE 452); International Agric. Corp. v. Powell, 31 Ga. App. 348, 349 (5) (120 SE 668); Morrow v. Fitzpatrick, 34 Ga. App. 801 (131 SE 189).…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parris v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Starnes v. Mutual Loan & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- International Agricultural Corp. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Morrow v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Lawrence v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tatum v. Bank of CummingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Leiter v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966