Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown v. Superior Court of Sacramento County

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2016No. S232642Published

1Dissent

CHIN, J.,

Dissenting.—In my view, the superior court was correct. I would deny the instant writ petition.

The 2014 amendment to Elections Code section 9002 (section 9002) was a legislative reform designed to improve the initiative process. This case sets *355the precedent establishing whether that section can function as a true reform to achieve its intended purpose, or if it is an empty shell—just another rule that can easily be evaded with a little imagination.

As amended, section 9002, subdivision (a), requires a 30-day period of public review of all proposed initiative measures, during which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Californians for an Open Primary v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API