Legal Opinion

In re King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Beferee has reported that respondent is guilty of three charges of professional misconduct. The evidence fully supports the findings. Bespondent appeared at two of the three meetings of the Grievance Committee but failed to appear at any of the hearings before the Beferee.

The basis for the first charge is the disposition of an escrow fund held by respondent to satisfy his- client’s creditors. All of the creditors who could be subpoenaed testified before the Beferee, with one exception, that they had never been paid. The Beferee found that respondent had converted a substantial portion of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re BuchbinderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API