Legal Opinion

John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Vandeventer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 4, 1935No. 32,094PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an action ón a promissory note, and to foreclose a mortgage. Judgment on the note was given for plaintiff. The court refused to foreclose the mortgage on the fee-simple estate, but rendered a decree of foreclosure against a life estate on the land in question. From this judgment plaintiff appeals.

The petition set out the note, and a mortgage on- 400 acres of land in Jewell county securing it, and alleged a default in payments.

The defendants answered admitting the execution of the note and mortgage and the default. The answer further…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walkenhorst v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. Equitable Investment Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Clevenger v. FigleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Goodman v. CretcherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Choctaw & Chickasaw Nations v. City of Atoka, OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  2. Kistler v. Fitzpatrick Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Hodges v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  4. Choctaw & Chickasaw Nations v. City of Atoka, OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  5. Hodges v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API