Ouellet v. Cummins
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.
This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. R A. D. A, Rule 8A appeal by third-party defendant Mann after entry of judgment for the defendants on their claims against her for contribution and indemnification.
Defendants James R. Cummins and his wife, defendant Ruthann Cummins (“the Cumminses”), lived in a Northbridge, Massachusetts subdivision called the “Heights at Hill Street 2.” Lots in that subdivision were subject to a building restriction requiring a minimum of 2,500 square feet of living space per new home construction.
In June, 1994, Mr. Cummins noticed that a lot 3 near his house was being marketed for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Elias v. Unisys Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Decker v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- A.L. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Rockdale Management Co. v. Shawmut Bank, N.A.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Good v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.