Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vitiello v. Mayrich Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 1998Published

1Dissent

Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.,

dissent in a memorandum by Mazzarelli, J., as follows: I agree with the majority that the motion court improperly granted plaintiffs motion “on default,” as the record establishes that defendant’s opposition papers were before the court prior to its determination. However, because I believe the plaintiff established her entitlement to partial summary judgment on liability, and the alleged errors during the damages trial do not warrant reversal, I would affirm the judgment.

“The proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Dermatossian v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API