Legal Opinion
In Re Prudential Insurance Company America Sales Practice Litigation Agent Actions, Michael P. Malakoff, Esquire, and Malakoff, Doyle & Finberg, P.C.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 24, 2002No. 99-5960Published
1Opinion of the Court
278 F.3d 175
In re PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY AMERICA SALES PRACTICE LITIGATION AGENT ACTIONS, Michael P. Malakoff, Esquire, and Malakoff, Doyle & Finberg, P.C., Appellants.
No. 99-5960.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued December 5, 2000.
January 24, 2002.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED David J. Armstrong (Argued), Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C., Michael P. Malakoff, Malakoff Doyle & Finberg, P.C., Pittsburgh, PA, Counsel for Appellants.
Allyn Z. Lite (Argued), Bruce D. Greenberg, Lite DePalma Greenberg & Rivas, LLC, Newark, NJ, Melvyn I. Weiss, Barry…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- In Re: Cendant Corporation LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Eash v. Riggins Trucking Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Fellheimer, Eichen & Braverman, P.C. v. Charter Technologies, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.