Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 19, 2013PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Erie County Court (Kenneth E *1216Case, J.), entered. August 14, 2012. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends that he was denied due process because he did not receive timely notification that “his . . . case [was] under review and that he . . . [was]…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. McDanielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. People v. CurthoysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. JordanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. People v. MyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. People v. BoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. BOGAN, REQUIERE, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. BoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API