Legal Opinion

Johnson Service Co. v. Richard J. Curry & Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1976No. 7514SC872PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant’s three assignments of error present the question of whether the court erred in allowing into evidence Henry Sowell, Jr.’s and James G. Potter’s verified itemized statements of plaintiff’s account with the defendant.

G.S. 8-45 provides:

“Itemized and verified accounts. — In any actions instituted in any court of this State upon an account for goods sold and delivered, for rents, for services rendered, or labor performed, or upon any oral contract for money loaned, a verified itemized statement of such account shall be received in evidence, and shall be deemed prima…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nall v. . KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Endicott-Johnson Corp. v. . SchochetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dixie Chemical Corp. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Carmayer, LLC v. Koury Aviation, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2018
  3. Vanlandingham v. Northeastern Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API