Legal Opinion
Ames v. Beal
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 12, 1933PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.
The defendants jointly executed two leases by which the plaintiffs demised to them certain office rooms in the Ames Building in Boston. The original declaration in two counts sought to recover “for rental of premises . . . under an indenture of lease” for a period several years after the expiration of the term stated in the lease. No further express agreement was entered into between the plaintiffs and the defendants either individually or jointly after the execution of the leases but upon the expiration of their terms the defendants continued to occupy the premises as they had done before,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bucholz v. Green Bros. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Pizer v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Leavitt v. MaykelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Benton v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Shapiro v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Menici v. Orton Crane & Shovel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Wadsworth v. Boston Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Blume v. Oil-O-Chron, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Story v. Lyon Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Souza v. BeckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.