Legal Opinion

Ocean Science & Engineering, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 18, 1979No. 239-75PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before the court on the parties’ exceptions to the opinion, findings of fact, and *3conclusions of law of Trial Judge Francis C. Browne, submitted in accordance with Rule 134(h). Trial Judge Browne determined that the United States had neither infringed the patent of Willard Bascom (Count I of the petition), nor breached an implied contract of confidentiality between the government and plaintiffs (Count II). Although plaintiffs disagreed with the trial judge’s resolution of their claims under both counts, in order to simplify the issue on appeal, they chose to focus on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Decca Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Westerngeco L.L.C. v. Ion Geophysical Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
  2. M-I Drilling Fluids UK Ltd. v. Dynamic Air Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
  3. Westerngeco L.L.C. v. Ion Geophysical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  4. Westerngeco L.L.C. v. Ion Geophysical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API