Legal Opinion
Bhoj v. Bargold Storage Systems, LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 10, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution, false arrest, and intentional infliction of emotional *438distress, the defendants Bargold Storage Systems, LLC, Vest-pro Management Corporation, Jay Paretsky, and Gerald Goldman appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), dated March 21, 2002, which denied their motion for leave to renew their prior motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
A motion for leave to renew is based upon new facts which were previously unavailable (see CPLR 2221; Nelson v RPH…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Bulis v. Di LorenzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Nelson v. RPH Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gerbino v. GerbinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Archstone v. Tocci Building Corp. of New Jersey, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014