Legal Opinion
Nash v. Wiseman
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 20, 1963No. Civ. 8536PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIZLEY, District Judge.
The above numbered and styled cause is before this Court on the motions for summary judgment filed by both parties pursuant to a stipulation filed herein. From the stipulation and briefs filed by the respective parties, it is clear that no genuine issue exists between the plaintiffs and the defendant as to any material fact.
This suit arises under the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 and jurisdiction is conferred on this Court by 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) (1).
The plaintiffs in this action are all non-eompetent Pottawatomie Indians who are wards of the United States acting by and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Squire v. CapoemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Choteau v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Superintendent of Five Civilized Tribes v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Walker v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Manchester Band of Pomo Indians, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
- Lawrence R. Fry and Nellie R. Fry, Husband and Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Horton Capoeman v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Joseph I. Swietlik, Personal Representative of the Estate of Helen v. Safran, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.