Legal Opinion

Snopes Media Group, Inc. v. Mikkelson

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 3, 2022No. 3:21-cv-01730Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 SNOPES MEDIA GROUP, INC., Case No. 21-cv-1730-BAS-DEB 14 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 15 v. MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 4) 16 BARBARA MIKKELSON, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 Plaintiff Snopes Media Group (“Snopes Media”) filed a First Amended Complaint 21 (“FAC”) against Barbara Mikkelson, alleging two causes of action for: (1) violation of 22 California Penal Code § 496 (receipt of stolen funds), and (2) unjust enrichment. 23 (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff alleges that Ms. Mikkelson received stolen funds…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API