Legal Opinion

Scipio E. Spinks v. United States Postal Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 19, 1980No. 77-3858PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

The appellant, Scipio Spinks, is employed by the United States Postal Service in Oakland, California, as a supervisor. Until November of 1975, he worked on tour one (11 p. m. to 7:30 a. m.), when he was transferred to tour three (3:30 p. m. to midnight). Supervisors were then paid, in addition to their base pay, an hourly night differential premium for each hour worked at night. Since the transfer resulted in his working fewer nighttime hours, his night differential pay was reduced by approximately $14.00 per week as a result of the transfer. He filed this action in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. NAACP (ATLANTA LOC.) v. United States Postal Serv.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1975
  5. Duncan v. BlattenbergerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1956

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Michael Booher v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Harrison v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  3. Jefferson Wilson v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Lutz v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982
  5. Caldwell v. BolgerDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API