Legal Opinion

Myers v. Brownell

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 15, 1824PublishedCited by 3 opinions

THIS was an action of ejectinent for eleven acres of land in Pownall, part ~f a farm of one hundred and sixty acres formerly owned by Samuel Cord.

Read the full summary

THIS was an action of ejectinent for eleven acres of land in Pownall, part ~f a farm of one hundred and sixty acres formerly owned by Samuel Cord. On trial upon the general issue at the last term, the plaintiff to maintain the issue on his part, gave in evidence a copy of a record of the County Court by which it appeared that on the 15th of November, 1820, said farm was attached at the suit of the plaintiIl, Myers, against Cord.-That judgment was rendered in favour of Myers against Card in that suit at June terra, 1821. — That Myers prayed out execution on the judgment, and on the 3d of…

1Opinion of the Court

Skinner, Ch J.

delivered the opinion of the Court. The plain, tiff, Myers, claims in his declaration eleven acres and forty-three rods of land in Pownall, being part of a fat m of one hundred and sixty acres, formerly owned by Samuel Card. The action was tried at the last term under the general issue. The plaintiff to maintain the issue on his part, showed in evidence copies of the record of the County Court, from which it appeared-that on the 15th of November, 1820, the farm was attached at the suit of Myers against Card; judgment in that suit was rendered June term, 1821; and the lands m…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re HutchinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2004
  2. Marshall v. WoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1833
  3. Bullard v. LeachSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API