Legal Opinion

Crippen v. Crippen

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 8, 1986No. Civ. 4989PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a divorce case.

The trial court, after an ore tenus hearing, divorced the parties, made a division of the marital property, and awarded the wife periodic alimony of $200 per month.

The husband appeals, contending that the trial court abused its discretion in its division of the marital property and award of periodic alimony. We disagree and affirm.

It is a well-settled rule of law in Alabama that the determination of alimony and division of property are within the trial court's discretion. See Hanson v. Hanson,467 So.2d 961 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985); Perry v. Perry, 460 So.2d 1324…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eubanks v. EubanksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  2. Scott v. ScottCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. Langford v. LangfordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  4. Echols v. EcholsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. Hudson v. HudsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Phelps v. PhelpsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  2. Rogers v. RogersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Sheffield v. SheffieldCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. Wilson v. WilsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Blanton v. BlantonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API