Legal Opinion

Smith & Marsh v. Northern Neck Mutual Fire Ass'n

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 9, 1911PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Northumberland county in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiffs assign error.

1Opinion of the Court

Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The firm of Smith & Marsh represent that on the 14th of March, 1908, they instituted an action of trespass on the case in assumpsit in the Circuit Court of Northumberland county against the Northern Neck Mutual Fire Association of Virginia, a corporation chartered under the laws of the State of Virginia, which resulted in a final judgment against them, which is before this court for review.

It appears that on the 18th of September, 1905, Smith & Marsh insured for two years a stock of merchandise in their storehouse at Miskimmon, in Northumberland…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Bronson v. KinzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  3. Jackson v. LamphireSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  4. Curtis v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Town of Danville v. PaceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Allen v. Mottley Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  2. Kee v. Shelter InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. James Lile Hupman v. Harold C. Cook and Cook and Robinson, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  4. Taylor v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Helena Light & Ry. Co. v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API