Legal Opinion

Shackleford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 21, 1990No. 89-915PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHIVERS, Chief Judge.

Appellant was convicted and sentenced for sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine with intent to sell. Only the latter conviction is appealed. Appellant maintains possession of cocaine with intent to sell is a specific intent crime and, therefore, the trial court erroneously denied defense counsel’s timely request for a jury instruction on voluntary intoxication.

“[A] defendant charged with [a] specific intent [crime] is entitled to a jury instruction on voluntary intoxication when there is evidence of the use of intoxicants and the defendant is intoxicated at the time…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Price v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Glenn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API