Legal Opinion

King's of Boise, Inc. v. MH King Company

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1965No. 9385PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Plaintiff (appellant) King’s of Boise, Inc., is the successor in interest to Arbuckle, King & Whillock, Inc. In April, 1946, plaintiff’s predecessor filed a certificate of assumed or fictitious name designating that it was doing business under the name of “King’s”. The name adopted was the surname of Stan King, who at that time became the active head of the business. Plaintiff and its predecessor were engaged in the retail sale of shoes, handbags and accessories. Over the years plaintiff has done extensive advertising of its business under that name, and the name has come to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Audio Fidelity, Inc., a Corporation v. High Fidelity Recordings, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
  3. Lady Esther, Ltd. v. Lady Esther Corset Shoppe, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  4. Jewel Tea Co., Inc. v. KrausCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  5. Keller Products, Inc. v. Rubber Linings Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farm Service, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. V. J. Doyle Plumbing Co. v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API