Legal Opinion

Dietz v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1875PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from McLennan. Tried below before the Hon. H. W. Battle, Judge of the Criminal Court of the city of Waco.

1Opinion of the Court

Roberts, Chief Justice.

There is no venue proved, as shown in the statement of facts contained in the transcript of the record, nor are there any facts proved from which the court could ex officio know, or from which the jury could be held to have reasonably inferred, that the transactions constituting the offense had occurred in McLennan county.

This defect is not cured by certificates of the district attorney and presiding judge that certain witnesses did prove on the trial that the facts occurred in McLennan county, which were made and filed in the District Court long after the case had been…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Belcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. First Baptist Church v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API