Legal Opinion

Silveira v. Ah Lo

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

*703OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J.

Tlie plaintiff executed two leases to the defendant, one to expire May 1, 1903, the other January 1, 1905, each being for fifteen years and at a monthly rental. Before the termination of these leases he executed a third lease of the same and othei lands to one Mendonca to begin June 1, 1900, and to be rent free for the first four months and at a specified rental per month for the further term of fifty years. He afterwards brought this action for the rent that accrued under the first two leases from January 1, 1900, to February 28, 1902, and obtained a verdict…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Biddle v. HussmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  2. Peck v. NorthropSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1845
  3. Gray v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  4. Gale v. EdwardsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1864

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Foster v. Waiahole Water Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Kaleiheana v. KeahipakaHawaii Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API