Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Train

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided September 29, 1903No. 461PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maine.

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, District Judge.

This case involves an agreement or pledge under which the plaintiff below, as selling agent of the Bangor Pulp • & Paper Company, had advanced money largely in excess of the value of the replevied goods; and one which contemplated that the material in question—bundles and rolls of paper already finished into paper from pulp, and such as should from day to day be finished—should be delivered to the plaintiff, now the defendant in error, as security for the sums so advanced. There is no question here as to the consideration or as to the actual good faith of the parties,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Casey v. CavarocSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Thorndike v. BathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Merrill v. ParkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1844

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McCaffey C. Co., Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Bush v. Export Storage Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1904
  3. Love v. Export Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  4. Beiser v. Western German BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  5. Philadelphia Warehouse Co. v. WinchesterDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API