Legal Opinion

Morgan's Executors v. Biddle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1791PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

These four causes were tried together by the same jury, *3by consent. They were severally brought to recover 3057b .4s. 3d. in the defendant’s hands as marshal of the admiralty, arising from the sales of the ship Emperor of Germany and brig Catharine, libelled in that court for seamen’s wages.

The chief question that arose, was, whether Morgan’s executors had a lien on the ship and three-fourths of the brig, in consequence of an instrument of writing, in the nature of a bottomree-bond, or mortgage, made by James Oellers, the owner, to Dr. John Morgan. The facts were these. — On the 24th August…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chase v. RalstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clow v. WoodsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1819

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API