Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hoover Co. v. Mihm

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1996No. 1994-1788PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 619.] THE STATE EX REL. HOOVER COMPANY, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. MIHM, ADMR., BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION, APPELLEE AND CROSS- APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Hoover Co. v. Mihm,

1996-Ohio-168.] Mandamus to compel Bureau of Workers’ Compensation to consider relator’s withdrawal from participation in the R.C. 4123.343 handicap reimbursement program effective for the first half of 1990 or for the bureau to calculate its assessment for that period under the pre-1990 rate standard—Writ denied, when. (No.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Huntington Insurance Agency, Inc. v. DuryeeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. The PEOPLE v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Condee v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Huntington Ins. Agency, Inc. v. DuryeeOhio Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SouthamOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API