State v. Munson
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
We are asked to decide whether the Superior Court (DiClerico, J.) improperly denied the defendant’s mistrial motion after evidence was erroneously admitted that the defendant at his arrest exercised his rights to remain silent and to confer with counsel. We find that the admission of the evidence was not prejudicial and therefore affirm the trial court’s decision.
The defendant was tried before a jury on a charge of aggravated felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:2 (Supp. 1983), of a thirteen-year-old girl. The evidence admitted against the defendant included the victim’s testimony describing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. RuelkeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- State v. WelchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- State v. SeeleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. RoacheSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. JudkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. RemickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.