Legal Opinion

Iversen v. Docon

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 27, 1936No. 5696PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.

In the brief for appellants it is stated: “The only question involved in the petition for review, and consequently the only question involved in this appeal, is a single question of law, and is stated by the referee in his certificate as ‘whether the court, under section 74, may confirm an extension proposal which permanently and finally reduces or waives the amount of interest provided in the obligations of secured creditors, accruing subsequent to the date of the filing of Debtors’ petition, such reduction or waiver having received the consent of the requisite…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sexton v. DreyfusSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Tuttle v. ArmsteadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
  3. Hine v. MyrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Janes v. Fitchburg R. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Watson v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re SwartzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  2. Coursey v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  3. Kausal v. LynnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API