Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Stork

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 3, 1985No. 84-227PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petitioner, Francis Louise Stork, seeks review of the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals, 475 So.2d 622, which upheld the trial court's refusal to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of third-degree assault.

The sole issue before this Court is whether a person who denies committing an offense with which he is charged is, nevertheless, entitled to a jury instruction on a lesser included offense supported by the evidence.

Petitioner was charged with assault in the first degree, and the trial court charged the jury on assault in the first andsecond degrees, but refused…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chavers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Fulghum v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  3. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Lami v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  2. McNabb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Nelson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  5. Whitehead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API