Legal Opinion
United States v. Gillilan
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 5, 1961No. 26331PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
288 F.2d 796
UNITED STATES, Appellee,
v.
Charles H. GILLILAN, Albert A. Finer, Joseph R. Synder, Apex
Distributing Company, Inc., Wilshire Sales
Associates, Inc. and Melrose
Corporation, Appellants.
No. 128, Docket 26331.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Dec. 9, 1960.
Decided April 5, 1961.
Daniel H. Greenberg, New York City, for Charles H. Gillilan and others.
Myles B. Amend, Myles B. Amend, Jr., New York City, of counsel for Charles H. Gillilan.
Lyle W. Rucker, Los Angeles (Daniel H. Creenberg, New York City, of counsel), for Joseph R. Snyder.
Marie L. McCann, Cornelius W.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- United States v. GillilanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Seastrom v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Harry BernsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Gaf Corporation, Gaf Chemicals Corporation, Jay & Company, Inc., James T. Sherwin, Gaf Corporation, James T. SherwinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Applicability of 18 U.S.C. § 281 to Selling Activities of Retired Military Officers, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1981
- United States v. Franz ByrdCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Franz ByrdCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.