Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Fairchild

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 13, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The sole question of law presented upon this accounting is whether or not decedent’s widow is entitled to dower in the lands of which her husband died seized or whether she is put to an election between her dower interest and the benefits conferred by the will. The estate is reasonably sizable, amounting to well over $2,000,000. At the time of his death testator owned his residence at 845 Carroll street, Brooklyn, with garage at 833 Union street, which were devised to the widow in fee. As disclosed by the account, the only additional realty was certain property at Bay Shore, N. Y.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Konvalinka v. . SchlegelNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. In Re the Accounting of GordenNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. In re FitterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of GreenbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  2. In re the Estate of GriffinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. In re the Estate of BachmannNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  4. In re the Estate of RehillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  5. In re the Estate of DooleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API