Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Oldenburg
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 8, 1994No. Nos. 91-4093, 91-4095 and 91-4137PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), acting in its corporate capacity,1 sued certain former officers and directors of the State Savings & Loan Association of Salt Lake City, Utah (State Savings) for fraud and negligence. It also sued to recover under two separate savings and loan blanket bonds issued to State Savings. This appeal involves only the two blanket bonds. The district court issued a series of pretrial rulings and then held a bench trial, after which it made extensive findings of fact and entered judgment for the FDIC on both fidelity bonds. The…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. J. William OldenburgCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- John McComish v. Ken BennettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- McComish v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010