Stillwater Water Co. v. Farmer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Washington county, Williston J., denying a motion to dissolve a writ of temporary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
START, O. J.
This is the second appeal in this action. Reference is here made for a full statement of the character of the action and its material facts to the opinion on the former appeal. 89 Minn. 58, 93 N. W. 907. It is sufficient for our present purpose to state that the action was brought to obtain a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from excavating on his own land in the immediate vicinity of a spring on the plaintiff’s ..land, from which, by means of its waterworks plant, the plaintiff supplies the people of the city of Stillwater with watery and from thereby collecting and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stillwater Water Co. v. FarmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- McGregor v. CaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Gorton v. Town of Forest CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tuttle v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Erickson v. Crookston Waterworks, Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Farmer v. Stillwater Water Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Meyer v. Town of PetersburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905