Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brandon v. Chefetz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 19, 1983Published

1DissentAsch, J.

I would reverse the order appealed from to deny the defendants’ motion striking and vacating the interrogatories served by plaintiffs. The interrogatories at bar were served to ascertain the identity, description and location of documents. “[Ijnterrogato*669ríes are appropriate and useful in enabling the seeking party to obtain lists and other detailed information to set the stage for meaningful depositions.” (Comstock & Co. v City of New York [Bower Bay WPCP], 80 AD2d 805, 807.) The use of interrogatories in this complex commercial action is entirely proper and provides an expeditious method of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barouh Eaton Allen Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. L.K. Comstock & Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Clifton Steel Corp. v. County of Monroe Public Works DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API