Legal Opinion

Berry v. Allgood

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 19, 1984No. 65719PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth by Judge Smith in his opinion for the Court of Appeals, Eastern District, copy of which is appended.

There is no conflict between the conclusions of the majority and the cases of Kennedy v. Holladay, 105 Mo. 24, 16 S.W. 688 (1891); and McGraw v. O’Neil, 123 Mo.App. 691, 101 S.W. 132 (1907), cited by the dissenting judge in certifying the case to us. Both of those cases hold that the trial judge properly exercised his discretion in determining that the contact with jurors there shown did not require new trial.

WELLIVER, HIGGINS,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. HolladaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. McGraw v. O'NeilMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mathis v. Jones Store Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Portis v. GreenhawMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Green v. Lutheran Charities Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Neighbors v. WolfsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Knothe v. BelcherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API