Legal Opinion
Tucker v. City of Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 25, 1984No. 78 W.D. Appeal Docket 1983PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McDermott, justice.
The issue in this appeal is the same as that presented in Bindex Corp. v. City of Pittsburgh, 504 Pa. 584, 475 A.2d 1320 (1984): whether appellant’s activities as a commercial illustrator entitles her to an exemption from the City of Pittsburgh’s Business Privilege Tax. 1 The facts of this case are set forth below.
Appellant, Dorothy D. Tucker, t/a Lynn Dohoney, was a self-employed commercial illustrator during the 1977 calendar year. Appellant’s work involved producing illustrations for a variety of clients, to be used by them for billboards, newspapers, advertising,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norris Bros. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
- Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. Berlo Vending Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Philadelphia School District v. Parent Metal Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Bindex Corp. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bakerstown Container Corp. v. Richland TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Township of Muhlenberg v. Clover Farms Dairy Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Ohiopyle Prints v. Uniontown Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- City of Philadelphia v. Tax Review Board ex rel. Sawin Systems, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- City of Williamsport v. Sun-Gazette Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.