Legal Opinion
Partee v. Stegall
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 30, 2001No. 00-1318PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Robert Na‘il Partee appeals pro se from a district court judgment that dismissed his habeas corpus petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. His appeal has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Partee was sentenced to life imprisonment after being convicted of first-degree murder and a felony-firearm offense, violations of Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 750.316 and 750.227b. In affirming that sentence, the state court of appeals…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Beverly A. Seymour v. Diane Walker,respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Gerald BARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- People v. ParteeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by3 opinions
- Butler v. OwensDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Creech v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Holmes v. GibbsDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2021