Legal Opinion

In re Richards

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided September 20, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On petition to review the action of the referee in appointing a trustee.

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, District Judge.

Strictly speaking, there is nothing for the court to decide, as the referee has not certified the question presented, but as this omission can probably be supplied, the matter may as well be disposed of without further delay. The controversy arises over the action of the referee in appointing a trustee after the creditors had failed to make a choice, a majority in number voting for one person and a majority, in amount for another. The dissatisfied creditor insists that the referee erred in appointing the candidate of the majority in number. He also objects to the action…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re BlankfeinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schieber v. HamreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  2. In re Capitol Trading Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1916
  3. In re KretzDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
  4. In re ScullyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Crocker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API