Legal Opinion

Kaeppler v. Redfield Creamery Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Spink county. Hon. A. W. Campbell, Judge. Action by H. A. Kaeppler against the Redfield Creamery Company to recover for certain labor and lumber. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFuller, P. J.

This action, to recover for certain labor and lumber, resulted in a judgment for $71.85 in favor of plaintiff, and the defendant appeals. Although every question urged as a ground for reversal has received careful attention, the admission of testimony relating to a ratification by the corporation of the purchase of material and the employment of help by one Henry Braun is the only matter that need be discussed in the opinion.

The evidence rightfully admitted under the complaint, though conflicting, is sufficient to justify a finding by the jury ihat, about a month before the Redfield Creamery…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bommer v. American Spiral Spring Butt Hinge Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Perry v. Little Rock & Fort Smith Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harrill v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. St. John's First Lutheran Church v. StorsteenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Engler v. Ipswich Printing Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Moriarity v. MeyerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API