Legal Opinion
Janes v. Janes
New York County Courts
Decided March 15, 1919Published
Action for partition.
1Opinion of the CourtHazard, J.
The parties to this action are the heirs-at-law of Johnathan Janes, and their wives. Johnathan Janes was in his lifetime the owner of a farm consisting originally of some sixty-three or sixty-five acres, and located in the town of Vienna in this county. He died intestate in April, 1880. The plaintiff is a son of John P. H. Janes, and is- the grantee of certain heirs of Johnathan who have conveyed their interest to him. His father, John P. H. Janes, the defendant, is living on the farm in question. It *726appears that during the lifetime of Johnathan Janes, John P. H., his son, sometime about the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lewis v. . New York Harlem R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Culver v. . RhodesNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Clapp v. BromaghamCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1827
- Florence v. . HopkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Archibald v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.