Legal Opinion

State v. Rush

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 11, 1933No. 31,446PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

Defendant was prosecuted on an information charging embezzlement from A. W. Knisely and charging obtaining money from Knisely by false pretenses. Certain counts of the information were quashed, and a plea in abatement of the prosecution with respect to other counts was sustained. The state appeals.

Before stating the contents of the information, and the proceedings under it, it may be well to sketch composition of the embezzlement statute.

The embezzlement statute of 1868 provided that if any clerk, apprentice or servant of a private person or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BancroftSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. State v. HibbardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. State v. RickseckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. State v. HayesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  5. State v. YeiterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. State v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  3. State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  4. State ex rel. James v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  5. State v. RehgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API