Legal Opinion
Gaspard v. Offshore Crane & Equipment
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided February 14, 1996No. Civil Action No. 94-0261Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
BERRIGAN, District Judge.
Defendant Anglo-American Insurance Company, Ltd. (“Anglo-American) has moved for summary judgment dismissing the third-party demand of Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (“Chevron”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
This litigation arises from a serious injury suffered by Raymond Gaspard. Gaspard was working as a roughneck for Nabors Drilling U.S.A., Inc. (“Nabors”). Chevron had hired Nabors to perform workover services on a Chevron platform in the Gulf of Mexico. Chevron had also entered into a Blanket Time Charter with Seaeor…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jensen v. SnellingsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Randall Ex Rel. Estate of Randall v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Helaire v. Mobil Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Porphire Lanasse v. Travelers Insurance Company, the California Company, Defendant-Third Party v. Royal Insurance Company, Excess-Surplus Lines, Inc., And/or Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Wiley v. Offshore Painting Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.