City of Durham v. EASTERN REALTY COMPANY
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.
In considering this case, it must be remembered that only the respondents Brunson (the lessees) have perfected their appeal. The City and the owners are apparently content with the verdict.
The lessees except to the failure of the Court to permit a separate trial as to their claims. This was entirely discretionary; and the lessees citing no authority in support of their position, and no abuse being shown, the exception is overruled.
“Under these circumstances, whether the issues relating to the damages, if any, sustained by (the tenants), should be determined by the same jury upon the same…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Brannon v. EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Sherrill v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Wheeler v. DentonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- City and County of Honolulu v. Market Place, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1973
- City of Charlotte v. Charlotte Park & Recreation CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Calco EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.