State v. Gunderson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant seeks a reduction in her sentence to the presumptive sentence under the guidelines, asserting that such a reduction is required because the trial court failed to provide reasons for the departure. We reverse.
FACTS
This is a sentencing appeal pursuant to Minn.R.Crim.P. 28.05. Appellant was charged in Hennepin County with one count of theft by false misrepresentation and four counts of theft by swindle. Minn. Stat. § 609.52, subds. 2(3)(c), 2(4) (1984). On January 3, 1986, pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant pleaded guilty to two counts of theft by swindle and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. PinceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. PendzimasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. GellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. PieriCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990