Legal Opinion

State v. Gunderson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 19, 1987No. C5-87-387PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant seeks a reduction in her sentence to the presumptive sentence under the guidelines, asserting that such a reduction is required because the trial court failed to provide reasons for the departure. We reverse.

FACTS

This is a sentencing appeal pursuant to Minn.R.Crim.P. 28.05. Appellant was charged in Hennepin County with one count of theft by false misrepresentation and four counts of theft by swindle. Minn. Stat. § 609.52, subds. 2(3)(c), 2(4) (1984). On January 3, 1986, pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant pleaded guilty to two counts of theft by swindle and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. State v. PinceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. PendzimasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. State v. PieriCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API