Legal Opinion

Buckingham Township v. Yaroschuk

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County

Decided July 6, 1977No. nos. 75-11359-08-1 and 75-11362-08-1 through 75-11368-08-1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, J.,

Seven suits in as-sumpsit have been instituted by Buckingham Township against various curative amendment zoning applicants to recover expenses incurred by the governing body in processing and hearing the applications. Preliminary objections to the complaints were filed on behalf of all defendants and submitted for disposition pursuant to Rule *266. By order dated February 18, 1977, the assigned judge sustained a preliminary objection of one of the parties in the nature of a motion for a more specific complaint and ruled plaintiff for more specific complaints in the remaining suits.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Raum v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. BitnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Montgomery's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Golla v. Hopewell Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Borough of Brookhaven v. BP Oil Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API