Legal Opinion

In re Royal

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided December 2, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Barikruptcy. On petition for discharge,

1Opinion of the Court

PURNELL, District Judge.

The referee after hearing, on September xo, 1901, the petition for discharge, under district rule 8, ¡upon* objection to such discharge, certified the record to the judge, ■'and the cause was heard at Wilmington, October 4, 1901. The following fact's appear: Jacob H. Royal was duly adjudged a bankrupt • on his own petition, filed April 29, 1901. At the time the petition :-was'filed and adjudication made the bankrupt had to his credit in the ■'bank of Clinton $109.38, which amount was not included in the • schedules filed, or afterwards accounted for or surrendered to…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bostian v. MilensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Farmers' Savings Bank v. AntonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  3. Gretsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
  4. In re RoyalDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1902
  5. Nealon v. ShuteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API