Legal Opinion

Boyce v. Stringfellow

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 5, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Potter County. Tried below before Hon. J. FT. Browning.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, Chief Justice.

— Appellants and appellees were subscribers and obligors upon an agreement to secure the right of wa.y, depot ground and ground for other terminal facilities at Amarillo, Texas, for the Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Bailway Company, which, in consideration thereof, agreed to extend its line of railway from Weatherford, Oklahoma, to a connection with the Pecos & Northern Texas, and the Fort Worth & Denver City lines of railway at Amarillo. Appellees, who were plaintiffs below, expended several thousand dollars in fulfillment of the agreement, to which appellants declined to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Faires v. CockerellTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Garrison v. CookeTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. McKeever, Cook & Co. v. Canonsburg Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  4. Canonsburg Iron Co. v. McKeeverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  5. Jackson v. MurrayTexas Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of California Department of Mental Hygiene v. Bank of the Southwest National Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hibdon v. MoyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Greenspan v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API