Legal Opinion

United States v. Govey

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 1, 2018No. Case No.: SACR 17–00103–CJCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I. INTRODUCTION

Due process demands that the Government disclose to a defendant all material evidence in its possession that is favorable to the defense. This disclosure must occur at a time when the evidence can be of use and value to the defendant. Sadly, the Government in this case failed to disclose the material evidence to Defendant in a timely manner. Inexplicably, the Government waited just days before trial to disclose almost 100,000 material documents that Defendant needed to expose the trial witnesses' motive and bias against him and to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Albert G. Hill III, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2018
  2. State v. Albert G. Hill III, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API