Legal Opinion
Rudgayzer & Gratt v. LRS Communications, Inc.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided September 29, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur M. Schack, J.
*160Plaintiff, a law firm, brings this motion to vacate summary judgment, which was granted in its favor, to allow plaintiff leave to amend the caption to continue this case as a class action or to dismiss this case without prejudice. If I were to grant any portion of this motion it would make this court an accomplice to plaintiffs counsel’s use of the judicial system for his pecuniary interest. If plaintiffs counsel prevails on this motion, he should use for his practice a variation of the New York State Lottery’s slogan “it’s a dollar and a dream” with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Tafflin v. LevittSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Weber v. U.S. Sterling Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Accounting Outsourcing, LLC v. Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, L.P.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2004
- Giovanniello v. Hispanic Media Group USA, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2004
- Giovanniello v. Hispanic Media Group UsaNew York Supreme Court, Nassau County · 2004